A Glass Reactor Offers Many Advantages to Processing Cannabis Oil
By Streamlining the Pesticide Remediation Process Cannabis Producers Achieve a Superior Product
One of the dilemmas growers face is how to handle the current pesticide situation. Growing cannabis is incredibly difficult without some type of pest management program. Unfortunately, the plant is naturally prone to spider mites, mold, mildew, bacteria, and other pests, which, if not handled correctly, can ruin crops and products. Cannabis can be grown organically with proper integrated pest management. Although worth the effort, it takes a lot of time and a tremendous amount of discipline. Some processors, operating in less regulated markets, spray indiscriminately. However, they risk their customers’ health and their reputation.
With most crops, the federal government investigates and approves pesticides at specific usage levels. Since cannabis remains illegal federally, no such oversight is in place. As a result, states are stepping into the breach by adopting standards recently published by the American Herbal Products Association (AHPA). Another body, the Foundation of Cannabis Unified Standards (FOCUS), is developing a set of international guidelines.
Limited Testing
Legal states now require testing products before they make it to retail shelves. Flower or extracts which fail to meet state standards are either thrown out or somehow get diverted to the black market. To be sure, pesticide free, organically grown cannabis garners a premium for a particular segment of consumers, but not all. Due to the difficulty of testing and the lack of standards, not to mention the high demand for cannabis, the majority of products sold in the US contain pesticides, residual solvents, and herbicides.
In 2016, Berkeley-based Steep Hill Labs detected pesticides in 84% of the medical cannabis samples they tested, each from a Californian dispensary. Edibles were among the most dangerous. When Oregon first went legal, few grow-ops could meet the state’s rigid standards. High pesticide levels have been found in samples from Colorado and Washington State, too.
Some experts estimate that only around 7% of the cannabis consumed in the country is tested. Since the trend bends towards legalization, sooner or later, more stringent testing will be required. As a result, soil to oil growers and processors should look closely at pesticide remediation. While current extraction techniques using supercritical fluids or hydrocarbon solvents help, they don’t offer the 90%+ purity desired. A secondary step is required.
Better Botanical Refinement
Several methods of pesticide remediation exist today. Currently, flash column chromatography is the most popular and has been used for decades in the pharmaceutical and chemical industries. Though reliable, it may not be the most effective method. Chris Beaver, a processor consultant, specializing in startups, consults with Ai Vacuum, a company specializing in botanical refinement equipment. Additionally, he owns a processing operation and is a partner in two others. During a phone interview recently, he stated, "I do everything besides CO2 extractions."
According to Beaver, a superior method is running cannabis crude oil through a glass reactor. "Half the time, we don't even have to go through the chromatography column," he said. "I use the reactor to pull any water-soluble pesticides that would otherwise be in the product." 90% of the pesticides used are water-soluble, including myclobutanil, a popular fungicide known commercially as Eagle 20. When ignited, myclobutanil turns into cyanide gas, making its presence potentially deadly.
Using a Glass Reactor
Besides speeding up the process and removing the majority of the pesticides and other chemicals, using a reactor also results in perfectly clear distillate. Additionally, Beaver mentioned, "I don't take a loss as I do in the chromatography column." He went on, “I'm just doing a water-soluble, liquid-to-liquid extraction in the reactor.
“Sometimes people won't flush enough solvent through the chromatography column, and they'll leave product in there. They'll take a loss on it, whereas the water-soluble (method) pulls out a lot of the stuff that would bind the THC up in the chromatography column. So, you get a lot better flow. If you're not doing this before you're doing chromatography, it really hurts you." What’s the process?
"You mix a solvent and the [cannabis] oil together, and the oil will not go into the water. However, water-soluble chemicals, the bad stuff, will precipitate out. Terpenes will precipitate out, certain pesticides, and a whole bunch of other chemicals too. I use a 100-liter glass reactor. I'll put in about five liters of crude [cannabis oil] and about 10-liters of solvent, pentane up to hexane, whichever the temperature inside your room will allow for. Then I'll pour in about 85-liters of water.
"Next you mix it for as fast as you can for about a minute, and then you let it settle. Once it settles, the bottom layer will be cloudy. It generally looks pink or red. We call it pink lemonade or fruit punch. If you've ever heard of the pink lemonade fraction, that's what it is. You pull it out in the water. And then you drain it out of the bottom. On the top layer, you're going to have hexane, which is what I use and your (cannabis) oil.
"When you drain it out of the bottom, you'll get down to that amount, and as soon as you see it get down to that (oil/solvent layer), you cap it and fill it back up with water. You're going to do that about five to seven times. After that, you'll see that you won't be pulling anything into the water anymore. These washes can be done at either a neutral pH or you can jump around too, depending on what chemical you have in your solution. You may have to go higher to pull certain pesticides out, or you have to go lower.
pH – A Critical Factor
"Generally, we don't go over a pH of 10, because THC becomes water soluble over that. You can pull the THC out with the water at that point. We'll continue to drain it, and once done, we'll pass it one time through a chromatography column."
Beaver warned, "You're going to want to make sure that you pH [test] everything. Having the pH off in this will lead to isomerization in your boiling flask when you go to distill it. It'll also lead to color changes. That's how people are getting purples and pinks. If you want that, this is how you do it. It's just a different pH. Half the time people are like, 'Oh, look at this purple I just made.' Really, they messed up, and they don't know what they're doing.
"Take it back to a pH of 6.9 or 7.2, and you can have perfectly clear distillate every time. This process allows you to adjust it and that's what you're going to have to watch. You can buy a very expensive pH meter, about $4,500. Alternatively, you need to buy a ton of those little strips and go through them constantly.
"Another thing you have to have is a salination and a desalination station in your work area. You're going to be making a saline solution. And you'll need to be able to get rid of it. So, you'll need something to boil it off or something. I know, in California, you can have a sand pit because technically the sand will pull the salt out. Because you're making salt water. At this amount, you'll be going through hundreds of gallons. I go through hundreds of gallons per day. That takes a lot of resources.”